Oregon School Activities Association
Fall Sports Schedules/Scores
Football | Volleyball | Girls Soccer | Boys Soccer | Girls XC | Boys XC
Football | Volleyball | Girls Soccer | Boys Soccer | Girls XC | Boys XC
2025 Volleyball Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Volleyball Articles
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 6-0 | 4 | 815.833 | 1 | 941.599 |
|
2 | 4-0 | 9 | 675.000 | 3 | 836.461 |
|
3 | 3-0 | 8 | 685.833 | 4 | 806.151 |
|
4 | 9-0 | 14 | 608.796 | 2 | 871.783 |
|
5 | 6-1 | 11 | 665.238 | 5 | 794.784 |
|
6 | 3-1 | 6 | 723.191 | 11 | 688.760 |
|
7 | 1-1 | 2 | 825.000 | 16 | 618.544 |
|
8 | 2-0 | 9 | 675.000 | 10 | 695.044 |
|
9 | 1-1 | 2 | 825.000 | 18 | 599.901 |
|
10 | 3-0 | 12 | 656.944 | 9 | 707.428 |
|
11 | 4-0 | 17 | 548.611 | 6 | 788.111 |
|
12 | 8-3 | 15 | 596.902 | 8 | 718.652 |
|
13 | 1-1 | 1 | 860.000 | 22 | 548.066 |
|
14 | 5-0 | 18 | 538.500 | 7 | 729.779 |
|
15 | 3-2 | 13 | 633.167 | 13 | 651.726 |
|
16 | 1-1 | 5 | 770.833 | 21 | 567.742 |
|
17 | 2-1 | 7 | 690.000 | 20 | 594.023 |
|
18 | 2-1 | 16 | 594.444 | 15 | 623.398 |
|
19 | 5-5 | 19 | 526.185 | 17 | 605.709 |
|
20 | 4-3 | 28 | 446.922 | 12 | 671.868 |
|
21 | 1-1 | 22 | 500.000 | 23 | 532.577 |
|
22 | 2-2 | 25 | 484.091 | 24 | 514.473 |
|
23 | 3-0 | 36 | 350.000 | 14 | 636.521 |
|
24 | 1-1 | 22 | 500.000 | 28 | 497.221 |
|
25 | 3-2 | 32 | 431.000 | 19 | 595.302 |
|
26 | 2-4 | 21 | 506.111 | 30 | 474.899 |
|
27 | 3-2 | 26 | 479.493 | 27 | 508.512 |
|
28 | 3-2 | 30 | 435.000 | 26 | 509.840 |
|
29 | 1-1 | 34 | 391.667 | 25 | 511.762 |
|
30 | 0-5 | 20 | 520.000 | 40 | 348.669 |
|
31 | 0-2 | 24 | 487.500 | 38 | 357.941 |
|
32 | 1-5 | 29 | 437.465 | 39 | 349.817 |
|
33 | 1-1 | 37 | 337.500 | 33 | 433.666 |
|
34 | 1-1 | 37 | 337.500 | 34 | 412.288 |
|
35 | 1-1 | 45 | 175.000 | 29 | 476.183 |
|
36 | 0-1 | 39 | 325.000 | 35 | 390.623 |
|
37 | 0-6 | 27 | 451.389 | 47 | 206.778 |
|
38 | 0-1 | 39 | 325.000 | 36 | 389.688 |
|
39 | 0-5 | 31 | 433.333 | 44 | 267.033 |
|
40 | 1-1 | 45 | 175.000 | 31 | 458.003 |
|
41 | 1-1 | 45 | 175.000 | 32 | 440.819 |
|
42 | 0-5 | 35 | 351.000 | 43 | 286.567 |
|
43 | 0-4 | 33 | 406.250 | 46 | 232.111 |
|
44 | 1-2 | 43 | 305.556 | 37 | 361.368 |
|
45 | 0-2 | 39 | 325.000 | 41 | 336.992 |
|
46 | 0-2 | 42 | 306.944 | 42 | 300.253 |
|
47 | 0-3 | 44 | 180.556 | 48 | 170.947 |
|
48 | 0-2 | 48 | 162.500 | 45 | 266.054 |
|
49 | 0-4 | 48 | 162.500 | 49 | 140.640 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 3 | 711.111 | 1 | 810.456 |
|
2 | 1-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 3 | 699.293 |
|
3 | 1-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 4 | 656.536 |
|
4 | 2-0 | 4 | 675.000 | 2 | 704.275 |
|
5 | 1-0 | 4 | 675.000 | 6 | 625.000 |
|
6 | 2-1 | 8 | 626.225 | 7 | 607.104 |
|
7 | 2-1 | 10 | 540.278 | 9 | 581.250 |
|
8 | 2-1 | 15 | 486.111 | 8 | 582.828 |
|
9 | 3-2 | 14 | 501.385 | 10 | 575.715 |
|
10 | 1-2 | 11 | 536.667 | 14 | 497.929 |
|
11 | 1-2 | 7 | 638.333 | 18 | 418.166 |
|
12 | 2-2 | 13 | 532.292 | 13 | 504.667 |
|
13 | 1-3 | 9 | 558.750 | 17 | 464.352 |
|
14 | 1-1 | 12 | 535.000 | 15 | 481.823 |
|
15 | 2-2 | 16 | 481.250 | 12 | 505.243 |
|
16 | 2-1 | 21 | 370.417 | 11 | 529.958 |
|
17 | 0-2 | 6 | 650.000 | 26 | 335.278 |
|
18 | 3-1 | 28 | 270.455 | 5 | 630.057 |
|
19 | 2-4 | 19 | 427.984 | 19 | 417.956 |
|
20 | 1-3 | 18 | 430.556 | 20 | 410.963 |
|
21 | 1-1 | 26 | 302.500 | 16 | 469.607 |
|
22 | 0-1 | 22 | 325.000 | 22 | 375.000 |
|
23 | 1-2 | 17 | 450.000 | 27 | 311.036 |
|
24 | 0-2 | 20 | 379.167 | 25 | 335.388 |
|
25 | 0-1 | 22 | 325.000 | 24 | 343.319 |
|
26 | 1-2 | 27 | 281.111 | 21 | 410.243 |
|
27 | 1-2 | 25 | 311.806 | 23 | 355.301 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 22 | 325.000 | 28 | 301.857 |
|
29 | 0-2 | 29 | 162.500 | 29 | 256.998 |
|
30 | 0-2 | 31 | 0.000 | 30 | 223.017 |
|
31 | 0-2 | 30 | 65.000 | 31 | 221.891 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 2-0 | 2 | 837.500 | 1 | 834.447 |
|
2 | 6-2 | 3 | 799.720 | 2 | 814.873 |
|
3 | 5-1 | 4 | 682.750 | 3 | 754.057 |
|
4 | 1-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 7 | 655.030 |
|
5 | 3-1 | 7 | 649.621 | 4 | 703.074 |
|
6 | 2-1 | 6 | 673.958 | 8 | 642.164 |
|
7 | 1-0 | 5 | 675.000 | 9 | 638.136 |
|
8 | 3-1 | 9 | 628.125 | 10 | 609.758 |
|
9 | 7-1 | 15 | 512.516 | 5 | 684.611 |
|
10 | 2-3 | 8 | 641.739 | 13 | 581.373 |
|
11 | 3-1 | 11 | 543.056 | 12 | 597.496 |
|
12 | 1-1 | 13 | 519.167 | 14 | 507.719 |
|
13 | 2-0 | 23 | 350.000 | 6 | 668.578 |
|
14 | 2-4 | 16 | 505.000 | 17 | 418.019 |
|
15 | 1-0 | 23 | 350.000 | 11 | 599.772 |
|
16 | 2-2 | 19 | 402.652 | 15 | 495.661 |
|
17 | 2-4 | 12 | 527.302 | 22 | 343.574 |
|
18 | 2-1 | 10 | 550.000 | 24 | 305.556 |
|
19 | 1-5 | 17 | 461.178 | 18 | 416.667 |
|
20 | 1-1 | 20 | 391.667 | 16 | 470.571 |
|
21 | 2-3 | 18 | 447.077 | 20 | 379.924 |
|
22 | 1-2 | 22 | 369.444 | 19 | 414.408 |
|
23 | 1-4 | 14 | 517.513 | 28 | 227.841 |
|
24 | 0-1 | 25 | 325.000 | 21 | 375.000 |
|
25 | 0-2 | 21 | 379.167 | 25 | 299.317 |
|
26 | 1-2 | 28 | 257.500 | 23 | 336.250 |
|
27 | 0-2 | 25 | 325.000 | 26 | 284.787 |
|
28 | 0-3 | 25 | 325.000 | 27 | 255.444 |
|
29 | 0-3 | 29 | 231.111 | 29 | 205.332 |
|
30 | 0-3 | 30 | 216.667 | 30 | 189.420 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 6-0 | 3 | 776.885 | 1 | 962.721 |
|
2 | 7-0 | 2 | 777.806 | 2 | 962.502 |
|
3 | 3-1 | 4 | 773.264 | 3 | 769.048 |
|
4 | 3-1 | 1 | 785.038 | 8 | 711.692 |
|
5 | 4-0 | 6 | 712.753 | 6 | 723.965 |
|
6 | 6-1 | 9 | 691.296 | 5 | 737.814 |
|
7 | 3-1 | 7 | 707.778 | 7 | 716.214 |
|
8 | 3-0 | 14 | 638.889 | 4 | 748.718 |
|
9 | 3-2 | 10 | 674.493 | 9 | 691.675 |
|
10 | 2-2 | 8 | 700.758 | 13 | 627.757 |
|
11 | 5-2 | 15 | 635.476 | 10 | 678.272 |
|
12 | 2-1 | 11 | 666.667 | 14 | 609.456 |
|
13 | 3-0 | 5 | 754.444 | 23 | 500.000 |
|
14 | 3-2 | 17 | 614.000 | 12 | 630.431 |
|
15 | 2-1 | 20 | 575.000 | 11 | 631.456 |
|
16 | 3-1 | 19 | 601.316 | 15 | 599.215 |
|
17 | 4-2 | 18 | 612.652 | 16 | 588.040 |
|
18 | 0-2 | 12 | 650.000 | 25 | 481.306 |
|
19 | 2-1 | 24 | 520.833 | 18 | 547.233 |
|
20 | 3-1 | 23 | 552.022 | 19 | 532.222 |
|
21 | 1-1 | 22 | 554.167 | 20 | 518.251 |
|
22 | 2-2 | 30 | 453.472 | 17 | 570.372 |
|
23 | 1-1 | 26 | 465.000 | 21 | 516.063 |
|
24 | 1-1 | 25 | 515.909 | 22 | 514.246 |
|
25 | 0-2 | 12 | 650.000 | 36 | 379.508 |
|
26 | 1-3 | 16 | 633.772 | 37 | 367.795 |
|
27 | 1-3 | 21 | 554.583 | 35 | 394.565 |
|
28 | 3-3 | 31 | 451.868 | 26 | 479.171 |
|
29 | 2-2 | 28 | 461.742 | 30 | 462.726 |
|
30 | 0-2 | 37 | 379.167 | 23 | 500.000 |
|
31 | 1-1 | 29 | 456.667 | 32 | 428.899 |
|
32 | 1-3 | 36 | 388.636 | 28 | 469.802 |
|
33 | 0-1 | 32 | 433.333 | 32 | 428.899 |
|
34 | 2-2 | 27 | 463.333 | 39 | 367.158 |
|
35 | 1-1 | 40 | 337.500 | 29 | 466.564 |
|
36 | 1-1 | 44 | 248.333 | 27 | 473.524 |
|
37 | 1-1 | 40 | 337.500 | 31 | 432.704 |
|
38 | 1-2 | 42 | 316.667 | 34 | 401.992 |
|
39 | 1-2 | 38 | 347.917 | 38 | 367.347 |
|
40 | 0-2 | 32 | 433.333 | 45 | 262.562 |
|
41 | 2-4 | 35 | 408.333 | 43 | 312.311 |
|
42 | 0-2 | 34 | 408.571 | 44 | 264.150 |
|
43 | 1-2 | 39 | 340.196 | 41 | 360.227 |
|
44 | 1-2 | 45 | 239.583 | 40 | 361.310 |
|
45 | 0-3 | 43 | 252.778 | 42 | 327.432 |
|
46 | 0-3 | 46 | 234.722 | 46 | 205.034 |
|
47 | 0-4 | 47 | 0.000 | 47 | 96.626 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 2-0 | 1 | 935.000 | 2 | 881.247 |
|
2 | 6-0 | 3 | 777.917 | 1 | 901.509 |
|
3 | 4-0 | 2 | 810.417 | 3 | 855.988 |
|
4 | 4-1 | 7 | 713.797 | 4 | 750.038 |
|
5 | 4-1 | 5 | 741.364 | 7 | 695.586 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 8 | 675.000 | 6 | 707.506 |
|
7 | 3-0 | 10 | 566.667 | 5 | 743.811 |
|
8 | 3-1 | 6 | 729.688 | 9 | 630.008 |
|
9 | 7-3 | 9 | 591.119 | 8 | 685.707 |
|
10 | 1-1 | 4 | 751.667 | 13 | 551.338 |
|
11 | 4-3 | 14 | 498.097 | 10 | 583.031 |
|
12 | 2-1 | 11 | 554.167 | 14 | 528.065 |
|
13 | 2-3 | 15 | 492.500 | 22 | 445.980 |
|
14 | 2-1 | 27 | 377.778 | 11 | 565.215 |
|
15 | 2-2 | 18 | 472.377 | 20 | 480.313 |
|
16 | 2-2 | 23 | 426.389 | 16 | 500.680 |
|
17 | 3-2 | 24 | 399.167 | 17 | 494.379 |
|
18 | 1-1 | 30 | 337.500 | 12 | 561.987 |
|
19 | 1-2 | 17 | 486.111 | 25 | 422.936 |
|
20 | 1-3 | 13 | 503.125 | 29 | 375.382 |
|
21 | 3-4 | 20 | 454.807 | 24 | 426.840 |
|
22 | 2-4 | 28 | 366.349 | 18 | 487.058 |
|
23 | 1-3 | 19 | 463.788 | 27 | 387.882 |
|
24 | 0-3 | 12 | 505.556 | 34 | 307.354 |
|
25 | 0-1 | 16 | 487.500 | 31 | 348.732 |
|
26 | 3-3 | 33 | 283.951 | 15 | 502.775 |
|
27 | 1-3 | 25 | 394.041 | 23 | 434.462 |
|
28 | 3-4 | 22 | 427.984 | 26 | 412.910 |
|
29 | 4-3 | 31 | 333.056 | 19 | 482.915 |
|
30 | 3-2 | 29 | 339.619 | 21 | 452.857 |
|
31 | 1-3 | 21 | 430.647 | 32 | 333.364 |
|
32 | 1-1 | 35 | 270.000 | 28 | 383.559 |
|
33 | 0-6 | 26 | 388.194 | 38 | 216.116 |
|
34 | 1-1 | 36 | 267.424 | 30 | 372.548 |
|
35 | 1-3 | 34 | 280.903 | 35 | 276.442 |
|
36 | 1-4 | 32 | 300.667 | 37 | 223.460 |
|
37 | 1-2 | 39 | 172.222 | 33 | 332.391 |
|
38 | 1-3 | 37 | 257.955 | 36 | 246.216 |
|
39 | 0-5 | 38 | 225.333 | 39 | 104.121 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-1 | 4 | 757.540 | 1 | 859.886 |
|
2 | 4-2 | 5 | 699.283 | 2 | 794.756 |
|
3 | 2-1 | 2 | 856.667 | 9 | 735.540 |
|
4 | 2-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 5 | 754.066 |
|
5 | 3-0 | 12 | 638.889 | 3 | 768.171 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 15 | 677.360 |
|
7 | 3-2 | 8 | 656.456 | 11 | 698.170 |
|
8 | 8-2 | 17 | 616.030 | 4 | 760.441 |
|
9 | 6-3 | 15 | 624.035 | 10 | 727.794 |
|
10 | 3-1 | 20 | 575.417 | 6 | 749.622 |
|
11 | 4-1 | 11 | 642.685 | 17 | 674.827 |
|
12 | 4-3 | 16 | 624.023 | 13 | 694.843 |
|
13 | 2-1 | 10 | 645.069 | 19 | 640.680 |
|
14 | 5-3 | 22 | 565.047 | 8 | 735.859 |
|
15 | 1-1 | 3 | 825.000 | 27 | 582.894 |
|
16 | 5-1 | 19 | 593.229 | 12 | 694.870 |
|
17 | 5-3 | 13 | 635.104 | 18 | 646.435 |
|
18 | 3-3 | 25 | 549.729 | 7 | 739.324 |
|
19 | 4-2 | 18 | 594.418 | 14 | 693.959 |
|
20 | 1-1 | 6 | 681.667 | 31 | 519.375 |
|
21 | 1-1 | 14 | 633.194 | 26 | 585.885 |
|
22 | 2-0 | 27 | 545.000 | 16 | 675.358 |
|
23 | 3-1 | 24 | 558.333 | 21 | 631.144 |
|
24 | 5-3 | 26 | 548.571 | 23 | 613.609 |
|
25 | 2-0 | 30 | 512.500 | 20 | 637.238 |
|
26 | 0-1 | 9 | 650.000 | 46 | 379.079 |
|
27 | 4-3 | 31 | 497.854 | 25 | 594.511 |
|
28 | 2-1 | 29 | 535.948 | 28 | 561.190 |
|
29 | 1-1 | 23 | 561.806 | 35 | 480.325 |
|
30 | 2-2 | 21 | 567.034 | 38 | 467.599 |
|
31 | 2-1 | 38 | 461.193 | 24 | 611.673 |
|
32 | 2-3 | 28 | 543.194 | 36 | 472.121 |
|
33 | 4-1 | 41 | 438.030 | 30 | 523.988 |
|
34 | 3-4 | 40 | 453.710 | 32 | 504.306 |
|
35 | 2-3 | 34 | 489.106 | 39 | 458.152 |
|
36 | 4-5 | 37 | 478.499 | 37 | 469.670 |
|
37 | 3-3 | 33 | 493.611 | 41 | 426.073 |
|
38 | 3-2 | 54 | 296.667 | 22 | 623.531 |
|
39 | 1-1 | 44 | 372.500 | 33 | 500.371 |
|
40 | 0-1 | 35 | 487.500 | 45 | 391.609 |
|
41 | 2-1 | 52 | 327.083 | 29 | 532.080 |
|
42 | 3-3 | 32 | 495.809 | 49 | 370.243 |
|
43 | 1-0 | 48 | 350.000 | 34 | 500.000 |
|
44 | 1-1 | 44 | 372.500 | 40 | 449.180 |
|
45 | 2-4 | 43 | 406.784 | 42 | 423.576 |
|
46 | 0-2 | 35 | 487.500 | 50 | 341.435 |
|
47 | 0-1 | 42 | 433.333 | 47 | 377.048 |
|
48 | 1-3 | 46 | 366.071 | 44 | 411.348 |
|
49 | 1-2 | 50 | 333.387 | 43 | 415.254 |
|
50 | 0-2 | 39 | 455.000 | 57 | 275.358 |
|
51 | 1-5 | 51 | 332.639 | 51 | 336.630 |
|
52 | 1-5 | 49 | 335.556 | 55 | 291.455 |
|
53 | 0-2 | 47 | 365.625 | 59 | 248.414 |
|
54 | 0-2 | 53 | 317.778 | 54 | 296.004 |
|
55 | 0-3 | 63 | 227.500 | 48 | 374.510 |
|
56 | 0-2 | 55 | 270.833 | 56 | 280.449 |
|
57 | 1-1 | 61 | 243.750 | 52 | 323.223 |
|
58 | 0-2 | 58 | 260.000 | 60 | 246.581 |
|
59 | 0-1 | 66 | 0.000 | 53 | 316.393 |
|
60 | 0-7 | 57 | 265.417 | 62 | 216.757 |
|
61 | 0-3 | 55 | 270.833 | 65 | 160.408 |
|
62 | 0-2 | 64 | 162.500 | 58 | 265.944 |
|
63 | 0-5 | 58 | 260.000 | 64 | 169.871 |
|
64 | 1-4 | 62 | 240.333 | 61 | 222.839 |
|
65 | 0-10 | 60 | 259.407 | 66 | 119.615 |
|
66 | 0-2 | 64 | 162.500 | 63 | 202.590 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
