Oregon School Activities Association
2024-25 Boys Basketball Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Basketball Articles
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 3 | 783.333 | 1 | 814.632 |
|
2 | 4-0 | 5 | 756.250 | 2 | 807.613 |
|
3 | 3-1 | 6 | 740.278 | 4 | 781.471 |
|
4 | 3-0 | 1 | 891.667 | 9 | 673.749 |
|
5 | 3-0 | 9 | 711.111 | 3 | 790.889 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 7 | 729.167 | 5 | 735.304 |
|
7 | 2-1 | 2 | 791.667 | 10 | 663.260 |
|
8 | 3-1 | 10 | 682.566 | 7 | 699.829 |
|
9 | 2-1 | 4 | 775.000 | 13 | 613.431 |
|
10 | 2-1 | 8 | 715.556 | 14 | 601.480 |
|
11 | 3-1 | 14 | 669.024 | 11 | 657.164 |
|
12 | 2-1 | 13 | 675.000 | 12 | 648.793 |
|
13 | 2-2 | 11 | 681.944 | 19 | 545.179 |
|
14 | 2-0 | 29 | 512.500 | 6 | 703.066 |
|
15 | 2-2 | 20 | 629.167 | 16 | 591.528 |
|
16 | 1-1 | 15 | 662.500 | 22 | 523.455 |
|
17 | 3-0 | 31 | 476.389 | 8 | 686.193 |
|
18 | 2-1 | 24 | 581.667 | 15 | 601.309 |
|
19 | 1-2 | 12 | 677.778 | 27 | 490.052 |
|
20 | 0-1 | 16 | 650.000 | 25 | 500.000 |
|
21 | 1-2 | 21 | 627.500 | 21 | 527.590 |
|
22 | 1-1 | 18 | 643.056 | 24 | 521.248 |
|
23 | 2-1 | 30 | 486.218 | 17 | 587.260 |
|
24 | 1-1 | 27 | 519.444 | 20 | 527.679 |
|
25 | 0-1 | 16 | 650.000 | 32 | 430.296 |
|
26 | 3-2 | 23 | 590.083 | 26 | 494.896 |
|
27 | 1-2 | 19 | 636.806 | 30 | 478.971 |
|
28 | 2-1 | 32 | 473.333 | 18 | 555.289 |
|
29 | 1-1 | 27 | 519.444 | 23 | 522.117 |
|
30 | 1-2 | 25 | 535.000 | 29 | 485.481 |
|
31 | 1-2 | 26 | 533.333 | 31 | 446.380 |
|
32 | 2-3 | 22 | 601.333 | 37 | 396.036 |
|
33 | 1-1 | 39 | 337.500 | 28 | 488.412 |
|
34 | 2-2 | 33 | 470.486 | 35 | 418.074 |
|
35 | 1-2 | 35 | 425.000 | 34 | 419.846 |
|
36 | 1-2 | 34 | 441.667 | 36 | 411.243 |
|
37 | 1-2 | 38 | 351.282 | 33 | 426.056 |
|
38 | 1-3 | 37 | 375.833 | 42 | 317.202 |
|
39 | 1-4 | 36 | 405.769 | 44 | 286.673 |
|
40 | 1-2 | 42 | 248.333 | 39 | 331.900 |
|
41 | 2-2 | 41 | 261.111 | 40 | 330.182 |
|
42 | 1-2 | 45 | 225.000 | 38 | 338.218 |
|
43 | 0-3 | 40 | 325.000 | 45 | 243.279 |
|
44 | 1-3 | 44 | 232.500 | 43 | 296.354 |
|
45 | 0-1 | 47 | 0.000 | 41 | 328.494 |
|
46 | 0-3 | 43 | 234.722 | 46 | 199.301 |
|
47 | 0-4 | 46 | 108.333 | 47 | 96.154 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 1 | 855.556 | 1 | 832.460 |
|
2 | 2-0 | 3 | 783.333 | 3 | 743.913 |
|
3 | 3-0 | 6 | 638.889 | 2 | 753.582 |
|
4 | 2-1 | 2 | 827.778 | 6 | 668.648 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 9 | 620.833 | 4 | 716.645 |
|
6 | 3-2 | 7 | 632.500 | 8 | 609.168 |
|
7 | 2-1 | 8 | 629.167 | 11 | 597.260 |
|
8 | 3-0 | 16 | 494.444 | 5 | 699.848 |
|
9 | 2-1 | 13 | 522.222 | 9 | 606.331 |
|
10 | 2-1 | 12 | 538.889 | 12 | 565.557 |
|
11 | 2-1 | 15 | 501.111 | 10 | 598.933 |
|
12 | 2-2 | 11 | 590.461 | 14 | 532.542 |
|
13 | 4-1 | 20 | 449.545 | 7 | 616.442 |
|
14 | 0-2 | 4 | 650.000 | 25 | 401.906 |
|
15 | 2-1 | 17 | 484.722 | 13 | 543.193 |
|
16 | 1-1 | 14 | 519.167 | 17 | 482.992 |
|
17 | 0-2 | 4 | 650.000 | 27 | 346.568 |
|
18 | 1-3 | 10 | 598.958 | 23 | 405.953 |
|
19 | 2-2 | 19 | 467.708 | 16 | 483.329 |
|
20 | 2-2 | 21 | 439.583 | 15 | 530.822 |
|
21 | 3-2 | 22 | 434.333 | 18 | 461.311 |
|
22 | 2-2 | 24 | 410.417 | 19 | 459.361 |
|
23 | 1-3 | 18 | 474.621 | 26 | 384.011 |
|
24 | 2-3 | 25 | 399.000 | 20 | 457.055 |
|
25 | 0-1 | 23 | 433.333 | 24 | 403.749 |
|
26 | 2-2 | 28 | 291.667 | 21 | 424.101 |
|
27 | 1-1 | 27 | 318.056 | 22 | 421.206 |
|
28 | 0-5 | 26 | 379.167 | 29 | 193.311 |
|
29 | 1-2 | 30 | 162.500 | 28 | 287.426 |
|
30 | 0-3 | 29 | 288.889 | 31 | 162.638 |
|
31 | 0-2 | 31 | 108.333 | 30 | 186.976 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 1 | 729.167 | 2 | 777.837 |
|
2 | 5-0 | 3 | 711.111 | 1 | 800.836 |
|
3 | 4-1 | 2 | 714.167 | 4 | 740.687 |
|
4 | 3-0 | 5 | 675.000 | 3 | 755.339 |
|
5 | 4-0 | 3 | 711.111 | 8 | 683.913 |
|
6 | 3-0 | 8 | 638.889 | 6 | 699.990 |
|
7 | 2-1 | 6 | 652.083 | 11 | 563.603 |
|
8 | 2-0 | 13 | 566.667 | 7 | 692.051 |
|
9 | 4-0 | 20 | 512.500 | 5 | 703.355 |
|
10 | 2-2 | 12 | 581.250 | 16 | 498.505 |
|
11 | 1-2 | 9 | 622.222 | 19 | 447.915 |
|
12 | 2-2 | 15 | 554.167 | 14 | 515.028 |
|
13 | 0-1 | 7 | 650.000 | 22 | 425.946 |
|
14 | 2-2 | 18 | 519.167 | 13 | 540.000 |
|
15 | 2-2 | 16 | 524.716 | 15 | 512.862 |
|
16 | 1-2 | 11 | 608.497 | 20 | 439.808 |
|
17 | 2-2 | 10 | 618.627 | 21 | 438.379 |
|
18 | 3-2 | 21 | 480.833 | 12 | 546.624 |
|
19 | 1-2 | 26 | 405.556 | 9 | 600.000 |
|
20 | 1-3 | 31 | 116.667 | 9 | 600.000 |
|
21 | 2-3 | 24 | 415.502 | 18 | 456.302 |
|
22 | 1-3 | 17 | 520.833 | 25 | 411.772 |
|
23 | 1-6 | 14 | 561.386 | 28 | 286.977 |
|
24 | 2-3 | 19 | 517.273 | 24 | 418.538 |
|
25 | 1-2 | 22 | 477.778 | 23 | 422.689 |
|
26 | 1-2 | 30 | 263.889 | 17 | 463.859 |
|
27 | 1-4 | 25 | 411.481 | 26 | 342.822 |
|
28 | 0-5 | 23 | 433.333 | 29 | 274.146 |
|
29 | 1-3 | 27 | 360.417 | 27 | 320.659 |
|
30 | 0-2 | 28 | 325.000 | 30 | 253.178 |
|
31 | 0-4 | 29 | 270.833 | 31 | 188.183 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-0 | 3 | 748.125 | 1 | 819.581 |
|
2 | 4-0 | 4 | 711.111 | 2 | 799.398 |
|
3 | 5-0 | 1 | 794.167 | 5 | 729.523 |
|
4 | 3-1 | 2 | 750.000 | 7 | 719.228 |
|
5 | 5-1 | 10 | 639.209 | 3 | 765.579 |
|
6 | 3-1 | 7 | 663.333 | 9 | 691.680 |
|
7 | 3-1 | 5 | 678.472 | 12 | 678.147 |
|
8 | 4-0 | 17 | 563.958 | 4 | 740.679 |
|
9 | 4-1 | 15 | 568.030 | 6 | 720.642 |
|
10 | 2-1 | 8 | 655.694 | 13 | 648.047 |
|
11 | 3-2 | 12 | 607.667 | 11 | 685.816 |
|
12 | 3-1 | 16 | 564.375 | 8 | 693.254 |
|
13 | 1-2 | 6 | 672.917 | 23 | 520.025 |
|
14 | 2-1 | 14 | 575.556 | 16 | 596.272 |
|
15 | 3-3 | 18 | 554.167 | 15 | 608.900 |
|
16 | 1-2 | 9 | 641.667 | 27 | 481.375 |
|
17 | 3-1 | 21 | 522.222 | 18 | 580.011 |
|
18 | 2-3 | 11 | 611.282 | 28 | 460.231 |
|
19 | 4-0 | 32 | 458.333 | 10 | 689.500 |
|
20 | 3-3 | 25 | 510.833 | 17 | 581.036 |
|
21 | 3-3 | 22 | 518.056 | 22 | 529.375 |
|
22 | 3-1 | 26 | 503.816 | 19 | 560.934 |
|
23 | 2-2 | 20 | 529.792 | 25 | 514.720 |
|
24 | 3-1 | 35 | 445.571 | 14 | 612.134 |
|
25 | 3-2 | 29 | 480.833 | 20 | 545.263 |
|
26 | 1-2 | 19 | 531.944 | 30 | 458.614 |
|
27 | 0-3 | 13 | 606.667 | 37 | 376.335 |
|
28 | 3-1 | 30 | 471.212 | 21 | 543.899 |
|
29 | 1-2 | 23 | 515.278 | 29 | 459.630 |
|
30 | 3-2 | 33 | 450.833 | 24 | 519.179 |
|
31 | 1-1 | 31 | 465.000 | 26 | 482.853 |
|
32 | 1-3 | 24 | 511.111 | 35 | 381.228 |
|
33 | 1-3 | 27 | 488.333 | 34 | 404.998 |
|
34 | 2-2 | 34 | 445.833 | 31 | 455.222 |
|
35 | 0-1 | 28 | 487.500 | 40 | 366.987 |
|
36 | 1-3 | 36 | 413.750 | 33 | 417.443 |
|
37 | 2-2 | 39 | 380.492 | 32 | 445.220 |
|
38 | 1-2 | 38 | 388.889 | 36 | 377.403 |
|
39 | 0-2 | 40 | 346.667 | 39 | 369.633 |
|
40 | 2-2 | 42 | 345.556 | 38 | 373.247 |
|
41 | 0-4 | 37 | 397.222 | 43 | 291.234 |
|
42 | 0-1 | 44 | 216.667 | 41 | 338.240 |
|
43 | 1-4 | 43 | 344.000 | 42 | 300.420 |
|
44 | 0-5 | 40 | 346.667 | 47 | 137.063 |
|
45 | 0-4 | 44 | 216.667 | 44 | 250.000 |
|
46 | 1-2 | 46 | 162.500 | 45 | 211.421 |
|
47 | 0-4 | 47 | 151.667 | 46 | 197.990 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 1 | 945.833 | 1 | 959.307 |
|
2 | 3-0 | 2 | 783.333 | 2 | 851.189 |
|
3 | 3-0 | 5 | 711.111 | 5 | 757.499 |
|
4 | 3-1 | 6 | 696.645 | 6 | 756.103 |
|
5 | 3-0 | 4 | 729.167 | 9 | 736.503 |
|
6 | 2-1 | 3 | 764.236 | 14 | 624.414 |
|
7 | 4-0 | 15 | 553.125 | 3 | 777.495 |
|
8 | 5-1 | 12 | 611.285 | 7 | 748.755 |
|
9 | 3-1 | 11 | 620.833 | 8 | 743.371 |
|
10 | 3-0 | 17 | 545.000 | 4 | 758.293 |
|
11 | 2-1 | 8 | 638.137 | 13 | 654.021 |
|
12 | 3-2 | 7 | 656.742 | 16 | 598.559 |
|
13 | 3-1 | 13 | 605.000 | 11 | 669.484 |
|
14 | 1-1 | 9 | 630.000 | 17 | 550.661 |
|
15 | 3-1 | 18 | 543.056 | 12 | 654.353 |
|
16 | 3-0 | 22 | 494.444 | 10 | 721.685 |
|
17 | 3-1 | 19 | 528.728 | 15 | 616.572 |
|
18 | 1-3 | 10 | 624.020 | 26 | 450.101 |
|
19 | 2-2 | 21 | 500.000 | 18 | 515.456 |
|
20 | 2-3 | 14 | 602.833 | 27 | 448.773 |
|
21 | 3-2 | 24 | 470.128 | 19 | 505.247 |
|
22 | 2-2 | 23 | 479.167 | 20 | 504.262 |
|
23 | 3-2 | 20 | 527.083 | 23 | 493.338 |
|
24 | 2-4 | 16 | 550.000 | 28 | 430.477 |
|
25 | 2-2 | 25 | 468.750 | 24 | 488.457 |
|
26 | 2-2 | 27 | 437.500 | 25 | 458.392 |
|
27 | 2-2 | 32 | 378.125 | 22 | 493.615 |
|
28 | 2-4 | 26 | 450.694 | 29 | 415.978 |
|
29 | 2-2 | 35 | 294.167 | 21 | 501.997 |
|
30 | 1-4 | 29 | 428.667 | 33 | 349.081 |
|
31 | 0-2 | 28 | 433.333 | 34 | 318.437 |
|
32 | 2-2 | 35 | 294.167 | 30 | 411.914 |
|
33 | 2-2 | 37 | 275.694 | 31 | 399.454 |
|
34 | 1-3 | 33 | 343.750 | 35 | 304.374 |
|
35 | 0-4 | 30 | 406.250 | 38 | 236.282 |
|
36 | 0-5 | 31 | 379.167 | 39 | 216.313 |
|
37 | 1-2 | 39 | 268.056 | 32 | 368.425 |
|
38 | 0-4 | 34 | 303.333 | 37 | 240.044 |
|
39 | 1-4 | 38 | 268.519 | 36 | 259.820 |
|
40 | 0-3 | 40 | 252.778 | 40 | 179.459 |
|
41 | 0-4 | 41 | 162.500 | 41 | 105.350 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-0 | 3 | 810.417 | 1 | 873.052 |
|
2 | 2-0 | 2 | 891.667 | 5 | 767.724 |
|
3 | 3-0 | 6 | 693.056 | 2 | 792.612 |
|
4 | 3-0 | 5 | 747.222 | 4 | 772.763 |
|
5 | 1-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 8 | 725.524 |
|
6 | 3-0 | 11 | 638.889 | 3 | 790.149 |
|
7 | 3-0 | 9 | 667.778 | 6 | 754.795 |
|
8 | 3-2 | 4 | 800.385 | 14 | 638.592 |
|
9 | 3-1 | 10 | 657.647 | 9 | 713.618 |
|
10 | 2-0 | 12 | 620.833 | 11 | 684.426 |
|
11 | 2-2 | 8 | 675.000 | 15 | 636.954 |
|
12 | 2-2 | 7 | 679.289 | 21 | 560.042 |
|
13 | 4-1 | 19 | 547.667 | 13 | 676.573 |
|
14 | 3-2 | 15 | 575.250 | 18 | 600.565 |
|
15 | 4-1 | 24 | 529.231 | 12 | 679.991 |
|
16 | 2-2 | 13 | 600.725 | 23 | 551.910 |
|
17 | 2-2 | 16 | 566.250 | 25 | 540.198 |
|
18 | 4-0 | 35 | 458.333 | 7 | 738.258 |
|
19 | 3-0 | 35 | 458.333 | 10 | 684.638 |
|
20 | 4-2 | 22 | 536.632 | 24 | 550.921 |
|
21 | 1-2 | 20 | 542.708 | 31 | 478.690 |
|
22 | 1-1 | 18 | 554.167 | 35 | 468.728 |
|
23 | 3-1 | 32 | 465.625 | 22 | 552.003 |
|
24 | 2-2 | 29 | 480.556 | 27 | 510.853 |
|
25 | 1-1 | 28 | 480.833 | 29 | 495.154 |
|
26 | 2-3 | 27 | 508.333 | 32 | 476.625 |
|
27 | 2-3 | 26 | 519.630 | 33 | 476.587 |
|
28 | 1-2 | 17 | 565.278 | 42 | 437.230 |
|
29 | 2-2 | 34 | 458.889 | 26 | 516.755 |
|
30 | 3-1 | 45 | 397.917 | 17 | 614.064 |
|
31 | 1-2 | 25 | 528.472 | 40 | 451.688 |
|
32 | 1-2 | 14 | 585.000 | 51 | 390.973 |
|
33 | 2-2 | 37 | 453.958 | 30 | 480.302 |
|
34 | 2-3 | 30 | 477.333 | 41 | 448.786 |
|
35 | 1-0 | 54 | 350.000 | 20 | 588.124 |
|
36 | 1-2 | 20 | 542.708 | 54 | 362.734 |
|
37 | 3-2 | 40 | 435.539 | 36 | 465.668 |
|
38 | 1-3 | 33 | 462.847 | 43 | 428.399 |
|
39 | 2-2 | 38 | 453.125 | 39 | 456.712 |
|
40 | 2-2 | 40 | 435.539 | 38 | 458.753 |
|
41 | 2-2 | 63 | 275.694 | 16 | 614.490 |
|
42 | 2-2 | 51 | 353.409 | 28 | 510.200 |
|
43 | 1-3 | 23 | 534.375 | 60 | 326.513 |
|
44 | 2-2 | 52 | 350.556 | 34 | 469.361 |
|
45 | 1-3 | 71 | 73.684 | 19 | 591.896 |
|
46 | 1-3 | 42 | 414.637 | 49 | 392.591 |
|
47 | 2-2 | 48 | 382.083 | 45 | 422.213 |
|
48 | 1-1 | 57 | 337.500 | 37 | 464.079 |
|
49 | 1-4 | 39 | 451.875 | 55 | 353.036 |
|
50 | 0-6 | 31 | 465.833 | 64 | 272.236 |
|
51 | 1-2 | 43 | 402.083 | 53 | 384.667 |
|
52 | 1-2 | 56 | 340.278 | 47 | 410.862 |
|
53 | 3-2 | 53 | 350.136 | 50 | 391.859 |
|
54 | 0-1 | 47 | 390.000 | 56 | 350.307 |
|
55 | 1-3 | 61 | 313.750 | 44 | 425.674 |
|
56 | 2-2 | 59 | 326.667 | 46 | 418.005 |
|
57 | 1-2 | 58 | 333.333 | 48 | 395.515 |
|
58 | 1-3 | 55 | 348.611 | 52 | 385.641 |
|
59 | 1-3 | 49 | 379.830 | 59 | 327.630 |
|
60 | 0-4 | 50 | 373.750 | 62 | 298.903 |
|
61 | 0-5 | 44 | 400.833 | 70 | 206.298 |
|
62 | 0-3 | 46 | 397.222 | 71 | 198.900 |
|
63 | 1-2 | 62 | 287.500 | 58 | 340.894 |
|
64 | 1-2 | 69 | 179.915 | 57 | 347.943 |
|
65 | 0-3 | 60 | 325.000 | 66 | 267.190 |
|
66 | 2-2 | 66 | 216.667 | 65 | 271.786 |
|
67 | 1-3 | 65 | 257.955 | 67 | 265.197 |
|
68 | 0-2 | 64 | 270.833 | 68 | 264.371 |
|
69 | 0-1 | 73 | 0.000 | 61 | 322.909 |
|
70 | 0-3 | 73 | 0.000 | 63 | 275.687 |
|
71 | 0-2 | 70 | 108.333 | 69 | 237.840 |
|
72 | 0-4 | 66 | 216.667 | 74 | 123.855 |
|
73 | 0-4 | 68 | 203.125 | 73 | 127.316 |
|
74 | 0-3 | 72 | 72.222 | 72 | 194.620 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
